LogoPlanetary Gear Motor
Loading...
WhatsApp
LogoPlanetary Gear Motor

Con la confianza de socios OEM globales en fabricación de precisión de alto rendimiento

Productos

  • Resumen de Productos
  • Aplicaciones
  • Capacidades OEM
  • Preguntas Frecuentes

Recursos

  • Nosotros
  • Contacto / RFQ
  • Blog
  • Guía de Compras en China
  • Calculadora de motor para robot de 10 kg

Empresa

  • Nosotros
  • Contacto

Legal

  • Política de Cookies
  • Política de Privacidad
  • Términos de Servicio
© 2026 Planetary Gear Motor. All Rights Reserved.|Traded as Linkup Ai., Co Ltd
Hybrid Tool + ReportKeyword: 10 kg robot motorsUpdated: 2026-05-17

10 kg Robot Motors Calculator and Selection Report

Enter your chassis conditions first to get ratio, torque, and shaft-fit direction. Then use the report layer to validate boundaries, compare options, and avoid interface mistakes before RFQ lock-in.

Send sizing briefOpen full contact form
Tool InputKey ConclusionsMethod & SourcesFAQ
Input and Run

Use 12.0 to model the common reference shaft in this calculator.

Boundary model range: mass 0.5-35 kg, wheel 40-180 mm, speed 0.2-8 m/s, grade 0-45%, Crr 0.005-0.15, mu 0.1-1.2, efficiency 45-97%, motor torque up to 3.5 Nm, output shaft 8-20 mm.

Result and Next Action
Empty state
Enter your drivetrain assumptions and run calculation to generate ratio and shaft-boundary guidance.
Minimal next-step path when result is inconclusive:
  1. Keep current ratio candidate and one adjacent higher ratio.
  2. Measure startup current and battery sag on your real controller ramp.
  3. Re-run this tool with measured values and then lock RFQ.
Traction DemandF = m(a + g sinθ + Crr g cosθ)Includes accel + grade + rolling lossWheel TorqueT = F x rPer-motor torque with SFRatio TargetRatio ≥ max(T, speed)Check 8:1 to 220:1 window

Core conclusions and key numbers

These summary blocks are decision-first. They convert tool outputs and evidence boundaries into practical procurement direction for 10 kg class mobile robot builds.

Tool output focus

Run calculator to generate a ratio recommendation and sample window.

Use this as a candidate window, not a final procurement lock.

Traction feasibility boundary

Traction feasibility is unresolved until friction coefficient and motion targets are entered.

If demand exceeds mu*N grip limit, torque sizing alone will not prevent wheel slip.

Shaft interface boundary

12 mm is a common baseline for this class, but direct fit still depends on hub geometry and tolerance.

Do not assume direct fit without checking hub standard and retention method.

Startup and shaft risk

Shaft-stress risk is unresolved until required torque and shaft diameter are entered.

High startup torque or undersized shaft pushes fit from pass to watch/fail quickly.

Evidence boundary

Public data is enough for screening, not enough for fatigue sign-off.

Complete sign-off still needs supplier curves and instrumented endurance runs.

Applicable / not applicable boundary
ConditionApplicableNot applicableAction
Ratio screeningCandidate window inside 8:1 to 220:1Required ratio above 220:1Raise motor torque or lower speed/grade demand.
Shaft interfaceNative hub standard with verified shaft retentionMixed parts without tolerance-verified adapterUse validated adapter and runout check.
Startup transientMeasured startup within controller/battery limitsUnknown or repeated overcurrent protection tripsTune ramp and gather current traces before RFQ.
Traction limitTraction demand stays below estimated µN boundaryTraction demand reaches or exceeds µN limitIncrease grip or reduce launch demand before final ratio lock.
Deployment safety scopeSafety case reviewed separately from drivetrain sizingCalculator output treated as deployment approvalRoute to ISO/Risk assessment workflow before field deployment.
Evidence qualitySupplier curve + endurance data availableCatalog-only numbers with no duty test evidenceRequire bench report and thermal run before sign-off.
Scenario density map
SprintBalancedClimb-heavySpeed demand ->Grade demand ->

Scenario zones summarize where teams usually move from speed-first designs to torque-reserve designs. Treat this as routing logic, then confirm with your own duty-cycle telemetry.

Hub interface boundary for 10 kg platforms

New evidence gain (stage1b): similar-mass robots still use different shaft/hub standards. Do not infer compatibility from weight class label alone.

PlatformHub sizeOfficial fitment evidenceDecision impact
Pololu 37D ecosystem6 mm motor shaft + optional 12 mm hex adapterCategory related products list compatible shaft adaptersMass class alone does not imply direct-fit hub size; adapter stack must be verified.
maxon GPX42 configurationConfigurable shaft geometry (length/flat/key options)Catalog configuration fields enumerate shaft optioningInterface compatibility is a configuration decision, not a default.
Cross-vendor mix (general case)No universal 10 kg standardNo reliable public unified standard foundTreat cross-vendor shaft/hub pairing as pending until tolerance and retention are validated.
Mid-stage CTA: lock your candidate set before bench spend

If your ratio window is clear but shaft interface or startup risk is still uncertain, send the current inputs now. We can map a short supplier-ready candidate list before you commit bench budget.

Send sizing briefOpen full contact form

Method, evidence, and trade-off depth

This layer explains how the tool result is constructed, what is known vs unknown, and what trade-offs matter when choosing a planetary ratio and shaft standard for 10 kg class robots.

Calculation logic and assumptions
StepEquationWhy it matters
Traction forceF = m(a + g sinθ + Crr g cosθ)Captures acceleration, slope load, and rolling resistance in one force target.
Wheel torqueT = F x rConverts force demand into drivetrain torque demand at the wheel.
Ratio by torqueRatio = (Twheel x SF / eta) / TmotorProtects against under-torque sizing when load spikes or duty drifts.
Ratio by speedRatio = motor rpm / wheel rpmPrevents selecting ratios that cannot reach target vehicle speed.
Shaft stress screentau = 16T / (pi d^3)Flags early shaft-overload risk before detailed fatigue analysis.
Stage efficiency and ratio risk
1 stage90%2 stage81%3 stage72%4 stage64%Example trend from one vendor family (maxon GPX42)More stages usually increase torque multiplication while adding compounded loss

More stages can provide higher ratios but can reduce net efficiency and push thermal demand upward. New dataset check: maxon GPX 42 UP stage data (2025) extends ratio reach to 1526:1, but with lower efficiency and larger package size.

Stage-count trade-offs from published vendor data

New factual increment (checked 2026-05-17): same-family stage data shows where higher ratio availability trades against efficiency, backlash, and package mass.

StageRatio bandMax efficiencyAvg backlashMax cont. torqueMax radial loadLengthMassDecision note
1-stage (UP)3.9:1 to 5.3:196%0.3°45 Nm350 N48.0 mm400 gLowest loss and smallest package, but limited ratio reach.
2-stage (UP)16:1 to 35:193%0.4°80 Nm525 N67.0 mm540 gBalanced for many builds; moderate size and loss increase.
3-stage (UP)62:1 to 231:190%0.5°120 Nm750 N86.0 mm660 gHigh ratio access with clear backlash and packaging penalties.
4-stage (UP)243:1 to 1526:187%0.6°120 Nm750 N104.5 mm790 gCounterexample to the 220:1 planning window; feasible but usually heat- and size-sensitive.
Scenario examples with assumptions and outcomes
ScenarioMassTarget speedGradeLikely ratio zoneOutcome note
Indoor AMR transfer bot9-10 kg1.6-2.0 m/s0-5%18:1 to 35:1Prioritize runtime and smooth start profile over peak speed.
General 10 kg rover10-11 kg1.8-2.4 m/s10-15%30:1 to 60:1Balanced zone for torque reserve and manageable thermal load.
Ramp-heavy inspection duty10-12 kg1.0-1.8 m/s20-28%55:1 to 120:1Use lower speed and higher ratio; watch gearbox efficiency drop.
Coarse terrain + strict launch time11-13 kg1.6-2.2 m/s20%+90:1 to 180:1Upper boundary zone; verify startup current, thermal rise, and shaft stress.
Tracked payload mover10-14 kg0.7-1.4 m/s30%+120:1 to 220:1High-ratio envelope where packaging and heat become the gating risks.
Comparison table: planetary and shaft-stack alternatives
OptionRatio bandShaft interfaceKnown strengthMain riskBest fit
Brushed DC + planetary (2WD)20:1 to 80:110-12 mm keyed or clamped outputLower BOM and straightforward control stackHigher brush wear under long duty cycleCost-sensitive indoor transport bots around 10 kg
BLDC + planetary (2WD/4WD)12:1 to 60:18-12 mm shaft with encoder-ready stackBetter efficiency and controllability at variable speedController tuning and EMI integration complexityLonger runtime and dynamic speed profiles
High-ratio crawler stack70:1 to 220:112 mm output with reinforced hubStrong climb torque and low-speed controlSpeed ceiling, efficiency loss, and thermal loadingRamp-heavy or rough-terrain missions
Hub motor + chain/belt reductionCustom external reductionWheel-integrated motor with external stagePackaging flexibility and modular replacementOpen drivetrain contamination and chain tension driftTeams that can maintain mechanical tuning regularly
Startup current and torque guardrails

New decision-critical guardrail: this table uses published Pololu 37D 12V 50:1 data to show why startup telemetry matters before final ratio lock.

ConditionPublished valueRisk if ignoredAction
Continuous torque planning (Pololu 12V 50:1 example)Recommended upper continuous load: 10 kg·cm (~0.98 Nm)Sustained operation near stall heats motor/gearbox quickly and shortens life.Hold routine duty near validated thermal zone and log motor-case temperature every cycle block.
Short burst / transient event (same model example)Instantaneous upper load: 25 kg·cm (~2.45 Nm)Repeated burst use can drive rapid wear or abrupt failure under shock loads.Allow only short bursts and add controller torque/current clipping for repeated events.
Startup current screenModel stall current: 5.5 A at 12 V; first-pass screening target: <=25% stall current for repeated dutyBattery sag, current foldback, and unstable acceleration make ratio results look better than reality.Log current and battery voltage during launch; rerun tool with measured startup multiplier.
Current envelope and model-linearity boundary

New factual increment (checked 2026-05-17): published current guidance and DC motor linearity explain why a ratio can pass on paper but still fail on battery/controller limits.

CheckPublished pointBoundary meaningExecution action
Voltage family choice (same gearbox family)Pololu 37D category: 12 V and 24 V families have similar nominal speed/torque; 24 V draws about half current.A ratio that looks fine on torque can still overload a low-voltage current budget.Screen controller and battery current margin together with ratio; do not validate ratio in isolation.
Continuous vs stall screeningPololu guidance: continuous load 10 kg.cm, instantaneous 25 kg.cm; brushed DC recommendation <=25% stall current.Repeated launches near stall current can cause second-level thermal damage and short lifetime.Set current clipping and log launch traces before RFQ freeze.
Linearity assumption for first-pass modelFAULHABER technical note states near-linear load-speed and current-torque relation for DC motors.Tool interpolation is useful for screening, but constants must come from the selected motor curve.Replace generic assumptions with vendor torque-speed-current points for final sizing.
Counterexample conditions for ratios above 220:1

Decision boundary clarification: this page uses 220:1 as default screening envelope, but published counterexamples exist. Use them only when trade-offs are explicitly accepted and verified.

ConditionPublished counterexampleTrade-off signalValidation gate
Need high climb torque at low top speedmaxon GPX 42 UP 4-stage offers 243:1 to 1526:1 published ratios.Same table shows efficiency/backlash/size penalties versus lower-stage options.Treat >220:1 as deliberate exception and run thermal + packaging sign-off, not default path.
Thermally constrained duty cycleFAULHABER duty guidance separates continuous and intermittent capability.Intermittent peaks can be feasible while continuous operation at the same point is not.Document duty cycle explicitly and verify winding temperature during real launch profile.
Noise / vibration limits in applicationPololu Rev 1.2 notes first-stage helical pinion used to reduce noise/vibration and improve efficiency.High reduction can solve torque but may still violate NVH targets if drivetrain stack is unmanaged.Add NVH check to candidate comparison, not only ratio/torque check.
Safety and compliance boundary (not replaced by sizing math)

This hybrid page now marks compliance scope explicitly: drivetrain sizing remains an engineering input, not a deployment safety approval.

BoundaryStandard signalNot coveredAction
Driverless truck / AMR safety verificationISO 3691-4:2023 abstract defines safety requirements and verification for driverless industrial trucks.The same abstract states requirements for power sources are not covered.Use this page for drivetrain screening only; maintain separate safety and power verification workflow.
Operating-zone dependencyISO abstract states operating-zone condition significantly affects safe operation and references Annex A preparation.Zone prep details are not available from the abstract page alone.Do not claim deployment readiness until zone hazards are mapped in your safety case.
Out-of-scope deployment contextsISO abstract excludes public-road and certain severe-condition contexts.This calculator does not assess those excluded contexts.Flag out-of-scope conditions early and route to domain-specific safety standard review.
Heuristic boundaries and confirmation status

Evidence-discipline update: where public evidence is insufficient, we explicitly mark pending status instead of overstating certainty.

BoundaryCurrent ruleEvidence statusNext step
Fit-band shaft stress thresholds (watch/fail MPa)Watch >70 MPa, fail >100 MPa (screening gate only)Pending (needs material-specific validation)Replace with material-specific allowable stress from your shaft cert and fatigue case.
Default ratio window paddingRecommended ratio x 0.85 to x 1.20 for candidate sweepPending (no reliable public universal multiplier data)Use at least one speed-priority and one torque-priority neighbor then bench-compare heat/current.
Traction feasibility ruleWatch >80% of mu*N limit, fail >100%Pending (depends on tire compound, contamination, and weight transfer)Replace default mu with measured slip-threshold data from your surface and payload.
Risk matrix and mitigation map
Probability ->Impact ->Ratio mismatch causes speed loss or overcurrentAdapter slip increases backlash and steering driftShaft overload under startup shocks
Risk typeTriggerImpactMitigation
Misfit ratioTorque ratio and speed ratio diverge too muchEither overcurrent or top-speed missSample three adjacent ratios and run load trace.
Traction shortfallRequired traction force approaches or exceeds µN limitWheel slip, unstable acceleration, and degraded path trackingIncrease tire grip or reduce launch demand, then rerun with measured µ.
Interface slipMixed shaft/hub standards without verified fitBacklash growth and steering driftUse verified adapter stack and runout screening.
Shaft overloadHigh startup multiplier + small diameter shaftPlastic deformation or early fatigueIncrease shaft section or reduce startup shock.
Validation path
ModelRun calculatorBenchCurrent + thermal traceDurabilityBacklash and hub checkRFQFreeze ratio + shaft stack

A practical hybrid-page workflow: use tool output for immediate direction, then add evidence until the decision is robust enough for procurement lock-in.

Source and uncertainty ledger
SourceUseScopeCheckedConfidence
DFRobot: How to Calculate the Motor Torque for a Mobile RobotSupports force -> torque -> power workflow for wheeled mobile robots.Primary reference for the structure of first-pass sizing equations.2026-05-17Primary
Pololu 37D Metal Gearmotors categoryConfirms common catalog ratio envelope and encoder availability.Reference ratio window for first-pass candidate screening.2026-05-17Primary
Pololu 37D Metal Gearmotor datasheet (Rev 1.2)

Published: Rev 1.2 PDF

Provides ratio-specific no-load speed and stall-torque examples.Used as benchmark data for 10 kg class scenario bands and startup checks.2026-05-17Primary
Pololu 37D 12V 50:1 gearmotor (item 4743)Adds published guidance on continuous load, instantaneous load, and stall current.Used for current and duty-cycle guardrails in the tool interpretation layer.

Caveat: Numbers apply to this model family only; replace with your chosen motor curve before release.

2026-05-17Primary
maxon GPX 42 catalog page EN-405 (2025)

Published: 2025 catalog page

Provides stage-by-stage ratio range, efficiency, backlash, and package trade-offs.Used to quantify what changes when a 10 kg robot spec pushes into high-ratio territory.

Caveat: Do not treat this single-vendor trend as universal across every planetary gearbox platform.

2026-05-17Primary
FAULHABER DC-Motors Technical InformationAdds linear speed/torque/current relationships and duty/lifetime caveats for brushed DC motors.Used to explain why current-limited launches and duty point selection change real output.

Caveat: Coreless micromotor guidance is directionally useful, but motor-family constants must still come from your selected datasheet.

2026-05-17Primary
Physics LibreTexts (OpenStax): Friction modelAnchors static friction upper bound fs(max)=mu_s*N and example mu ranges.Used for traction-feasibility boundary so torque results are not interpreted as guaranteed ground force.

Caveat: Surface contamination, tire compound, and transient load transfer can shift effective mu away from textbook values.

2026-05-17Secondary
ISO 3691-4:2023 abstract page

Published: Edition 2 (2023-06)

Defines safety-verification scope for driverless industrial trucks/AMRs and lists exclusions.Used to mark where drivetrain sizing is necessary but not sufficient for deployment readiness.

Caveat: This page cites abstract scope only. Full requirement clauses require licensed standard text.

2026-05-17Primary
Engineering ToolBox: Rolling resistance coefficientsProvides first-pass Crr range references by surface/material pair.Used only for initial estimate when measured rolling-loss data is unavailable.

Caveat: Surface state, tread, and pressure change Crr substantially; prefer measured field data.

2026-05-17Secondary
NIST Handbook 44 (2026), Appendix C length conversions

Published: 2026 edition

Anchors inch-mm conversion used in shaft-interface checks.Reference conversion: 1 inch = 25.4 mm.2026-05-17Primary
RoyMech: Torsion equations for solid and hollow shaftsProvides the solid-shaft torsional shear equation used in boundary checks.Secondary sanity check for tau = 16T / (pi d^3) modeling.

Caveat: Equation is first-pass only and does not include keyway notch, fatigue spectrum, or shock factors.

2026-05-17Secondary
Evidence gapStatusCheckedReasonAction
Controller current foldback vs battery sag in real launch eventsPending2026-05-17Open product pages rarely include foldback curves across battery voltage droop and temperature.Capture launch telemetry (voltage, current, speed) with your target pack and ramp profile.
Gearbox efficiency map at 10 kg duty profilePending2026-05-17Vendor catalogs provide limited spot points and not a full map by torque, speed, and oil temperature.Request bench map from shortlisted suppliers and validate against your mission cycle.
Rolling coefficient for actual terrain, tire pressure, and treadPending2026-05-17Public Crr values are broad estimates and drift significantly with load and surface condition.Measure coast-down or force-draw on your real route to replace default Crr assumptions.
Universal torsional-stress pass/fail threshold across shaft materialsPending2026-05-17No reliable public dataset maps one MPa threshold across all steel/aluminum shafts, keyway forms, and duty spectra.Treat MPa gate as screening only; confirm with supplier material cert + fatigue test before release.
Trackable friction coefficient under launch load transferPending2026-05-17Public mu tables are environment-level references and do not capture tire wear, contamination, or dynamic weight transfer.Measure slip threshold with your exact tire, payload, and surface; replace default mu in this tool with measured value.
Safety-clause mapping from ISO abstract to site-specific SOPPending2026-05-17Open abstract confirms scope/exclusions but not project-specific clause interpretation and verification method.Map your use case to the full standard text with safety engineering review before field deployment.

Related decision reads

0.5 hp geared motor sizing with compliance boundariesRatio-selection workflow for mobile robotsCompact drivetrain ratio and shaft-fit reference pageStep-loss root causes and drivetrain correctionDrive architecture trade-offs under duty-cycle pressureFactory validation and reliability workflowSubmit RFQ and get application review

FAQ by decision intent

FAQ is grouped by what engineering and sourcing teams actually need to decide next.

Input and setup

Interpreting results

Shaft and integration risk

Final CTA: move from estimate to validated RFQ

This hybrid page gives immediate directional output and the evidence context to avoid premature lock-in. If you want a supplier-ready stack, send your result and we can map candidate motors, ratios, and shaft interfaces to your actual duty profile.

Email

[email protected]

WhatsApp:+86 188 5797 1991
Abrir app de correoIniciar consultaWhatsApp

Iniciar consulta abre tu cliente de correo predeterminado con una plantilla RFQ precargada.