Enter your chassis conditions first to get ratio, torque, and shaft-fit direction. Then use the report layer to validate boundaries, compare options, and avoid interface mistakes before RFQ lock-in.
These summary blocks are decision-first. They convert tool outputs and evidence boundaries into practical procurement direction for 10 kg class mobile robot builds.
Run calculator to generate a ratio recommendation and sample window.
Use this as a candidate window, not a final procurement lock.
Traction feasibility is unresolved until friction coefficient and motion targets are entered.
If demand exceeds mu*N grip limit, torque sizing alone will not prevent wheel slip.
12 mm is a common baseline for this class, but direct fit still depends on hub geometry and tolerance.
Do not assume direct fit without checking hub standard and retention method.
Shaft-stress risk is unresolved until required torque and shaft diameter are entered.
High startup torque or undersized shaft pushes fit from pass to watch/fail quickly.
Public data is enough for screening, not enough for fatigue sign-off.
Complete sign-off still needs supplier curves and instrumented endurance runs.
| Condition | Applicable | Not applicable | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio screening | Candidate window inside 8:1 to 220:1 | Required ratio above 220:1 | Raise motor torque or lower speed/grade demand. |
| Shaft interface | Native hub standard with verified shaft retention | Mixed parts without tolerance-verified adapter | Use validated adapter and runout check. |
| Startup transient | Measured startup within controller/battery limits | Unknown or repeated overcurrent protection trips | Tune ramp and gather current traces before RFQ. |
| Traction limit | Traction demand stays below estimated µN boundary | Traction demand reaches or exceeds µN limit | Increase grip or reduce launch demand before final ratio lock. |
| Deployment safety scope | Safety case reviewed separately from drivetrain sizing | Calculator output treated as deployment approval | Route to ISO/Risk assessment workflow before field deployment. |
| Evidence quality | Supplier curve + endurance data available | Catalog-only numbers with no duty test evidence | Require bench report and thermal run before sign-off. |
Scenario zones summarize where teams usually move from speed-first designs to torque-reserve designs. Treat this as routing logic, then confirm with your own duty-cycle telemetry.
New evidence gain (stage1b): similar-mass robots still use different shaft/hub standards. Do not infer compatibility from weight class label alone.
| Platform | Hub size | Official fitment evidence | Decision impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pololu 37D ecosystem | 6 mm motor shaft + optional 12 mm hex adapter | Category related products list compatible shaft adapters | Mass class alone does not imply direct-fit hub size; adapter stack must be verified. |
| maxon GPX42 configuration | Configurable shaft geometry (length/flat/key options) | Catalog configuration fields enumerate shaft optioning | Interface compatibility is a configuration decision, not a default. |
| Cross-vendor mix (general case) | No universal 10 kg standard | No reliable public unified standard found | Treat cross-vendor shaft/hub pairing as pending until tolerance and retention are validated. |
If your ratio window is clear but shaft interface or startup risk is still uncertain, send the current inputs now. We can map a short supplier-ready candidate list before you commit bench budget.
This layer explains how the tool result is constructed, what is known vs unknown, and what trade-offs matter when choosing a planetary ratio and shaft standard for 10 kg class robots.
| Step | Equation | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Traction force | F = m(a + g sinθ + Crr g cosθ) | Captures acceleration, slope load, and rolling resistance in one force target. |
| Wheel torque | T = F x r | Converts force demand into drivetrain torque demand at the wheel. |
| Ratio by torque | Ratio = (Twheel x SF / eta) / Tmotor | Protects against under-torque sizing when load spikes or duty drifts. |
| Ratio by speed | Ratio = motor rpm / wheel rpm | Prevents selecting ratios that cannot reach target vehicle speed. |
| Shaft stress screen | tau = 16T / (pi d^3) | Flags early shaft-overload risk before detailed fatigue analysis. |
More stages can provide higher ratios but can reduce net efficiency and push thermal demand upward. New dataset check: maxon GPX 42 UP stage data (2025) extends ratio reach to 1526:1, but with lower efficiency and larger package size.
New factual increment (checked 2026-05-17): same-family stage data shows where higher ratio availability trades against efficiency, backlash, and package mass.
| Stage | Ratio band | Max efficiency | Avg backlash | Max cont. torque | Max radial load | Length | Mass | Decision note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-stage (UP) | 3.9:1 to 5.3:1 | 96% | 0.3° | 45 Nm | 350 N | 48.0 mm | 400 g | Lowest loss and smallest package, but limited ratio reach. |
| 2-stage (UP) | 16:1 to 35:1 | 93% | 0.4° | 80 Nm | 525 N | 67.0 mm | 540 g | Balanced for many builds; moderate size and loss increase. |
| 3-stage (UP) | 62:1 to 231:1 | 90% | 0.5° | 120 Nm | 750 N | 86.0 mm | 660 g | High ratio access with clear backlash and packaging penalties. |
| 4-stage (UP) | 243:1 to 1526:1 | 87% | 0.6° | 120 Nm | 750 N | 104.5 mm | 790 g | Counterexample to the 220:1 planning window; feasible but usually heat- and size-sensitive. |
| Scenario | Mass | Target speed | Grade | Likely ratio zone | Outcome note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indoor AMR transfer bot | 9-10 kg | 1.6-2.0 m/s | 0-5% | 18:1 to 35:1 | Prioritize runtime and smooth start profile over peak speed. |
| General 10 kg rover | 10-11 kg | 1.8-2.4 m/s | 10-15% | 30:1 to 60:1 | Balanced zone for torque reserve and manageable thermal load. |
| Ramp-heavy inspection duty | 10-12 kg | 1.0-1.8 m/s | 20-28% | 55:1 to 120:1 | Use lower speed and higher ratio; watch gearbox efficiency drop. |
| Coarse terrain + strict launch time | 11-13 kg | 1.6-2.2 m/s | 20%+ | 90:1 to 180:1 | Upper boundary zone; verify startup current, thermal rise, and shaft stress. |
| Tracked payload mover | 10-14 kg | 0.7-1.4 m/s | 30%+ | 120:1 to 220:1 | High-ratio envelope where packaging and heat become the gating risks. |
| Option | Ratio band | Shaft interface | Known strength | Main risk | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brushed DC + planetary (2WD) | 20:1 to 80:1 | 10-12 mm keyed or clamped output | Lower BOM and straightforward control stack | Higher brush wear under long duty cycle | Cost-sensitive indoor transport bots around 10 kg |
| BLDC + planetary (2WD/4WD) | 12:1 to 60:1 | 8-12 mm shaft with encoder-ready stack | Better efficiency and controllability at variable speed | Controller tuning and EMI integration complexity | Longer runtime and dynamic speed profiles |
| High-ratio crawler stack | 70:1 to 220:1 | 12 mm output with reinforced hub | Strong climb torque and low-speed control | Speed ceiling, efficiency loss, and thermal loading | Ramp-heavy or rough-terrain missions |
| Hub motor + chain/belt reduction | Custom external reduction | Wheel-integrated motor with external stage | Packaging flexibility and modular replacement | Open drivetrain contamination and chain tension drift | Teams that can maintain mechanical tuning regularly |
New decision-critical guardrail: this table uses published Pololu 37D 12V 50:1 data to show why startup telemetry matters before final ratio lock.
| Condition | Published value | Risk if ignored | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous torque planning (Pololu 12V 50:1 example) | Recommended upper continuous load: 10 kg·cm (~0.98 Nm) | Sustained operation near stall heats motor/gearbox quickly and shortens life. | Hold routine duty near validated thermal zone and log motor-case temperature every cycle block. |
| Short burst / transient event (same model example) | Instantaneous upper load: 25 kg·cm (~2.45 Nm) | Repeated burst use can drive rapid wear or abrupt failure under shock loads. | Allow only short bursts and add controller torque/current clipping for repeated events. |
| Startup current screen | Model stall current: 5.5 A at 12 V; first-pass screening target: <=25% stall current for repeated duty | Battery sag, current foldback, and unstable acceleration make ratio results look better than reality. | Log current and battery voltage during launch; rerun tool with measured startup multiplier. |
New factual increment (checked 2026-05-17): published current guidance and DC motor linearity explain why a ratio can pass on paper but still fail on battery/controller limits.
| Check | Published point | Boundary meaning | Execution action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voltage family choice (same gearbox family) | Pololu 37D category: 12 V and 24 V families have similar nominal speed/torque; 24 V draws about half current. | A ratio that looks fine on torque can still overload a low-voltage current budget. | Screen controller and battery current margin together with ratio; do not validate ratio in isolation. |
| Continuous vs stall screening | Pololu guidance: continuous load 10 kg.cm, instantaneous 25 kg.cm; brushed DC recommendation <=25% stall current. | Repeated launches near stall current can cause second-level thermal damage and short lifetime. | Set current clipping and log launch traces before RFQ freeze. |
| Linearity assumption for first-pass model | FAULHABER technical note states near-linear load-speed and current-torque relation for DC motors. | Tool interpolation is useful for screening, but constants must come from the selected motor curve. | Replace generic assumptions with vendor torque-speed-current points for final sizing. |
Decision boundary clarification: this page uses 220:1 as default screening envelope, but published counterexamples exist. Use them only when trade-offs are explicitly accepted and verified.
| Condition | Published counterexample | Trade-off signal | Validation gate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Need high climb torque at low top speed | maxon GPX 42 UP 4-stage offers 243:1 to 1526:1 published ratios. | Same table shows efficiency/backlash/size penalties versus lower-stage options. | Treat >220:1 as deliberate exception and run thermal + packaging sign-off, not default path. |
| Thermally constrained duty cycle | FAULHABER duty guidance separates continuous and intermittent capability. | Intermittent peaks can be feasible while continuous operation at the same point is not. | Document duty cycle explicitly and verify winding temperature during real launch profile. |
| Noise / vibration limits in application | Pololu Rev 1.2 notes first-stage helical pinion used to reduce noise/vibration and improve efficiency. | High reduction can solve torque but may still violate NVH targets if drivetrain stack is unmanaged. | Add NVH check to candidate comparison, not only ratio/torque check. |
This hybrid page now marks compliance scope explicitly: drivetrain sizing remains an engineering input, not a deployment safety approval.
| Boundary | Standard signal | Not covered | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Driverless truck / AMR safety verification | ISO 3691-4:2023 abstract defines safety requirements and verification for driverless industrial trucks. | The same abstract states requirements for power sources are not covered. | Use this page for drivetrain screening only; maintain separate safety and power verification workflow. |
| Operating-zone dependency | ISO abstract states operating-zone condition significantly affects safe operation and references Annex A preparation. | Zone prep details are not available from the abstract page alone. | Do not claim deployment readiness until zone hazards are mapped in your safety case. |
| Out-of-scope deployment contexts | ISO abstract excludes public-road and certain severe-condition contexts. | This calculator does not assess those excluded contexts. | Flag out-of-scope conditions early and route to domain-specific safety standard review. |
Evidence-discipline update: where public evidence is insufficient, we explicitly mark pending status instead of overstating certainty.
| Boundary | Current rule | Evidence status | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fit-band shaft stress thresholds (watch/fail MPa) | Watch >70 MPa, fail >100 MPa (screening gate only) | Pending (needs material-specific validation) | Replace with material-specific allowable stress from your shaft cert and fatigue case. |
| Default ratio window padding | Recommended ratio x 0.85 to x 1.20 for candidate sweep | Pending (no reliable public universal multiplier data) | Use at least one speed-priority and one torque-priority neighbor then bench-compare heat/current. |
| Traction feasibility rule | Watch >80% of mu*N limit, fail >100% | Pending (depends on tire compound, contamination, and weight transfer) | Replace default mu with measured slip-threshold data from your surface and payload. |
| Risk type | Trigger | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misfit ratio | Torque ratio and speed ratio diverge too much | Either overcurrent or top-speed miss | Sample three adjacent ratios and run load trace. |
| Traction shortfall | Required traction force approaches or exceeds µN limit | Wheel slip, unstable acceleration, and degraded path tracking | Increase tire grip or reduce launch demand, then rerun with measured µ. |
| Interface slip | Mixed shaft/hub standards without verified fit | Backlash growth and steering drift | Use verified adapter stack and runout screening. |
| Shaft overload | High startup multiplier + small diameter shaft | Plastic deformation or early fatigue | Increase shaft section or reduce startup shock. |
A practical hybrid-page workflow: use tool output for immediate direction, then add evidence until the decision is robust enough for procurement lock-in.
| Source | Use | Scope | Checked | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFRobot: How to Calculate the Motor Torque for a Mobile Robot | Supports force -> torque -> power workflow for wheeled mobile robots. | Primary reference for the structure of first-pass sizing equations. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| Pololu 37D Metal Gearmotors category | Confirms common catalog ratio envelope and encoder availability. | Reference ratio window for first-pass candidate screening. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| Pololu 37D Metal Gearmotor datasheet (Rev 1.2) Published: Rev 1.2 PDF | Provides ratio-specific no-load speed and stall-torque examples. | Used as benchmark data for 10 kg class scenario bands and startup checks. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| Pololu 37D 12V 50:1 gearmotor (item 4743) | Adds published guidance on continuous load, instantaneous load, and stall current. | Used for current and duty-cycle guardrails in the tool interpretation layer. Caveat: Numbers apply to this model family only; replace with your chosen motor curve before release. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| maxon GPX 42 catalog page EN-405 (2025) Published: 2025 catalog page | Provides stage-by-stage ratio range, efficiency, backlash, and package trade-offs. | Used to quantify what changes when a 10 kg robot spec pushes into high-ratio territory. Caveat: Do not treat this single-vendor trend as universal across every planetary gearbox platform. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| FAULHABER DC-Motors Technical Information | Adds linear speed/torque/current relationships and duty/lifetime caveats for brushed DC motors. | Used to explain why current-limited launches and duty point selection change real output. Caveat: Coreless micromotor guidance is directionally useful, but motor-family constants must still come from your selected datasheet. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| Physics LibreTexts (OpenStax): Friction model | Anchors static friction upper bound fs(max)=mu_s*N and example mu ranges. | Used for traction-feasibility boundary so torque results are not interpreted as guaranteed ground force. Caveat: Surface contamination, tire compound, and transient load transfer can shift effective mu away from textbook values. | 2026-05-17 | Secondary |
| ISO 3691-4:2023 abstract page Published: Edition 2 (2023-06) | Defines safety-verification scope for driverless industrial trucks/AMRs and lists exclusions. | Used to mark where drivetrain sizing is necessary but not sufficient for deployment readiness. Caveat: This page cites abstract scope only. Full requirement clauses require licensed standard text. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| Engineering ToolBox: Rolling resistance coefficients | Provides first-pass Crr range references by surface/material pair. | Used only for initial estimate when measured rolling-loss data is unavailable. Caveat: Surface state, tread, and pressure change Crr substantially; prefer measured field data. | 2026-05-17 | Secondary |
| NIST Handbook 44 (2026), Appendix C length conversions Published: 2026 edition | Anchors inch-mm conversion used in shaft-interface checks. | Reference conversion: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. | 2026-05-17 | Primary |
| RoyMech: Torsion equations for solid and hollow shafts | Provides the solid-shaft torsional shear equation used in boundary checks. | Secondary sanity check for tau = 16T / (pi d^3) modeling. Caveat: Equation is first-pass only and does not include keyway notch, fatigue spectrum, or shock factors. | 2026-05-17 | Secondary |
| Evidence gap | Status | Checked | Reason | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controller current foldback vs battery sag in real launch events | Pending | 2026-05-17 | Open product pages rarely include foldback curves across battery voltage droop and temperature. | Capture launch telemetry (voltage, current, speed) with your target pack and ramp profile. |
| Gearbox efficiency map at 10 kg duty profile | Pending | 2026-05-17 | Vendor catalogs provide limited spot points and not a full map by torque, speed, and oil temperature. | Request bench map from shortlisted suppliers and validate against your mission cycle. |
| Rolling coefficient for actual terrain, tire pressure, and tread | Pending | 2026-05-17 | Public Crr values are broad estimates and drift significantly with load and surface condition. | Measure coast-down or force-draw on your real route to replace default Crr assumptions. |
| Universal torsional-stress pass/fail threshold across shaft materials | Pending | 2026-05-17 | No reliable public dataset maps one MPa threshold across all steel/aluminum shafts, keyway forms, and duty spectra. | Treat MPa gate as screening only; confirm with supplier material cert + fatigue test before release. |
| Trackable friction coefficient under launch load transfer | Pending | 2026-05-17 | Public mu tables are environment-level references and do not capture tire wear, contamination, or dynamic weight transfer. | Measure slip threshold with your exact tire, payload, and surface; replace default mu in this tool with measured value. |
| Safety-clause mapping from ISO abstract to site-specific SOP | Pending | 2026-05-17 | Open abstract confirms scope/exclusions but not project-specific clause interpretation and verification method. | Map your use case to the full standard text with safety engineering review before field deployment. |
FAQ is grouped by what engineering and sourcing teams actually need to decide next.
This hybrid page gives immediate directional output and the evidence context to avoid premature lock-in. If you want a supplier-ready stack, send your result and we can map candidate motors, ratios, and shaft interfaces to your actual duty profile.
Iniciar consulta abre tu cliente de correo predeterminado con una plantilla RFQ precargada.